Consider the following matrix, as might arise from calculating covariance based on pairwise-complete data.

##         [,1]    [,2]   [,3]   [,4]   [,5]   [,6]    [,7]
## [1,] 100.511 159.266  3.888 59.964 37.231 32.944  68.845
## [2,] 159.266 277.723  6.161 95.017 58.995 52.203 109.090
## [3,]   3.888   6.161 99.831  2.320  1.440  1.274   2.663
## [4,]  59.964  95.017  2.320 35.774 22.212 19.655  41.073
## [5,]  37.231  58.995  1.440 22.212 40.432 12.203  25.502
## [6,]  32.944  52.203  1.274 19.655 12.203 10.798  22.566
## [7,]  68.845 109.090  2.663 41.073 25.502 22.566  96.217

This is not a proper covariance matrix (it has a negative eigenvalue).

eigen(vv)$values
## [1]  4.808047e+02  9.965048e+01  4.595154e+01  2.657509e+01  8.304329e+00
## [6]  6.685001e-04 -8.147905e-04

If we attempt to use the cov2cor() function to convert the covariance matrix to a correlation matrix, we find the largest correlation values are slightly larger than 1.0.

cc <- cov2cor(vv)
max(cc) # 1.000041
## [1] 1.000041

If this is passed to the corrgram function, it will issue a warning that the input data is not a correlation matrix and then calculate pairwise correlations of the columns, resulting in a non-sensical graph.

There are several packages with functions that can be used to force the correlation matrix to be an actual, positive-definite correlation matrix. Two are given here.

psych

require(psych)
## Loading required package: psych
## Warning in psych::cor.smooth(cc): Matrix was not positive definite,
## smoothing was done
max(cc2)
## [1] 1

sfsmisc

## [1] TRUE
identical(cc, t(cc)) # FALSE
## [1] FALSE
## [1] 1

After converting the matrix to a valid correlation matrix, an accurate corrgram can be created:

require(corrgram)
## Loading required package: corrgram
corrgram(cc2, lower=panel.cor)